YouTube Appeals Social Media Addiction Verdict

Reading

Read this text and listen to it at the same time. If you don’t know a word click it to see explanation, hear pronunciation or add it to vocabulary.

YouTube appealed a court decision in Los Angeles this week. The company said it did not design its platform to harm young users.

A young woman said social media made her mental health struggles worse. A jury found YouTube and Meta responsible for her addiction.

The jury decided to give the woman $3 million for her harm. Her lawyers think the next court will agree with this decision.

YouTube argued its platform is for videos, not social interaction. Meta also tried to get a new trial, but the judge said no.

This court case was the first of its kind to succeed. Its outcome could affect many other lawsuits against tech companies.

Answer the questions to the text. Speak or write, you choose. AI will assess your answers.

What did YouTube do this week?

YouTube appealed a court decision in Los Angeles.

What did the jury decide for the young woman?

The jury decided to give the woman $3 million for her harm.

Why is this court case important?

This court case was the first of its kind to succeed and could affect many other lawsuits against tech companies.

Look at the article image and describe what you see on it. You may either speak or write your answer there.

Discuss this article with your AI tutor to practice. Your tutor will help you with vocabulary and grammar.

Read a new article every day and
discuss it with AI at lingolette.com